Breaking down Trump’s New York civil fraud case: Key AP analysis points on KTAR News

Breaking down Trump's New York civil fraud case: Key AP analysis points on KTAR News

Trump’s Real Estate Empire Faces “Dissolution” Over Financial Misrepresentations

The Case Against Donald Trump is Unprecedented

Donald Trump, former president of the United States, is facing the possibility of having his real estate empire dissolved, as he is accused of repeated financial misrepresentations that violate New York’s powerful anti-fraud law. The legal case against Trump is unusual in several ways, including the fact that it is the only case of a major business that has been threatened with dissolution without citing obvious victims or major losses. According to a recent analysis by the Associated Press, a finding of fraud under New York’s Executive Law 63(12) does not necessarily require that misrepresentations result in anyone getting duped or losing money. However, the analysis found that in the dozen cases calling for “dissolution,” victims and losses were key factors. Legal experts warn that if the judge goes ahead with such a penalty in Trump’s case, it could set a harmful precedent for future legal action against companies.

What the AP Found in Its Analysis

The Associated Press conducted a review of nearly 150 cases reported in legal databases, and found that businesses shut down due to fraud under Executive Law 63(12) almost always have clear victims and significant financial losses. Some examples of dissolved companies include a breast cancer nonprofit that used nearly all of its $9 million in donations to pay for salaries and expenses instead of funding mammograms, research, and support for survivors; a private equity firm that fraudulently claimed investment success and stole millions of dollars from thousands of investors; and a mental health facility that looted $4 million from public funds while neglecting patients. However, the only example found by the AP of a business dissolved under the anti-fraud law without citing actual victims or losses was a small company that was shut down in 1972 for writing term papers.

The Significance of the Trump Case

In 2020, a New York Supreme Court Judge ruled that Trump had committed fraud by sending 11 years of allegedly inflated estimates of his net worth to Deutsche Bank and other lenders. The lawsuit was filed by the New York attorney general, Letitia James, who claimed the misrepresentations helped Trump receive lower interest rates. Although Trump’s alleged misrepresentations have not resulted in clear victims or significant losses for lenders, James has recommended that Trump be banned from doing business in New York and pay $370 million in ill-gotten gains. Judge Arthur Engoron, who is overseeing the case, has called for a “dissolution” of the Trump companies but left unclear what he meant by that term. Legal experts caution that this penalty could lead to Trump losing not only his New York properties but also Mar-a-Lago and other businesses. The case is under appeal, and many experts are concerned about the precedent that could be set if a major business is dissolved without clear victims or losses.

What the Case Against Trump Means for the Future of Business Law

The potential dissolution of Trump’s real estate empire is a significant legal case that could have far-reaching implications for the business world. If the dissolution is upheld, legal experts warn that it could become easier for courts to wipe out companies in the future, even when there are no clear victims or losses. However, others argue that a ruling in favor of dissolution would be a just penalty for Trump’s repeated misrepresentations, even if they did not directly cause harm to lenders or others. Ultimately, the case raises important questions about the balance between punishment and justice in cases of business fraud, and about the role of the law in regulating the behavior of powerful business leaders.


  • Donald Trump
  • financial misrepresentations
  • New York anti-fraud law
  • dissolution
  • Associated Press analysis
  • victims
  • losses
  • breast cancer nonprofit
  • private equity firm
  • mental health facility
  • ill-gotten gains
  • Leticia James
  • Deutsche Bank
  • Judge Arthur Engoron
  • Mar-a-Lago
  • business law

Originally Post From

Read more about this topic at
Taking Away Trump’s Business Empire Would Stand Alone …
Trump’s Business Empire Threatened By Judge’s Ruling

Inside a Massachusetts Family Home Reno Even Fido Could Appreciate

High-paying job alert! Top DC law firms offer Supreme Court clerks up to $500000